Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: The debt-ceiling deal: Winners and losers

  1. #31
    unedited FBD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    26,000LYR out, paying taxes to pedophiles
    Posts
    24,602
    vCash
    1000
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Thanks
    15,855
    Thanked 5,826 Times in 3,935 Posts
    That's why this "compromise" is a joke, just like we knew we'd get with Obama in office and Reid controlling the senate and even filibustering his own bill!

    By that measuring stick, simply freezing spending would be "saving 400+billion"...

    I cant believe "savings" means "dont spend at such a high rate, just lower it a bit....a tiny bit..."

    And then a bunch if left to commission, where the democrats have already tipped their hand and said they'll be looking for tax increases.

    How's about some spending cuts, assho's? Ya know, REAL ones?

  2. #32
    The Evil Banker Acid Trip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Liquid Microdot > You
    Posts
    6,648
    vCash
    2100
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Thanks
    461
    Thanked 1,164 Times in 800 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MuddyGut View Post
    So for example...

    If you made $200,000 in 1945 they would take 94% of your money? That leaves you with $12,000 to live on...

    While someone making $50,000 @ a .78 was left with $11,000 to live on..?

    That can't be right..
    That's now not how taxes work. They were taxed at 94% for every dollar OVER 250k. The first 250k was taxed at the listed rates. How long have you guys been paying taxes without knowing how tax brackets work?
    Last edited by Acid Trip; 08-03-2011 at 01:46 PM.

  3. #33
    21-Jazz hands salute Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    On the Waters of Life
    Posts
    47,246
    vCash
    9653
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Thanks
    25,971
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 8,172 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Acid Trip View Post
    That's now not how taxes work. They were taxed at 94% for every dollar OVER 250k. The first 250k was taxed at the listed rates. How long have you guys been paying taxes without knowing how tax brackets work?

    My accountant knows how they work just fine...

  4. #34
    I eat crayons. KevinD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    10,671
    vCash
    1500
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Thanks
    22,495
    Thanked 3,134 Times in 1,889 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Acid Trip View Post
    That's now not how taxes work. They were taxed at 94% for every dollar OVER 250k. The first 250k was taxed at the listed rates. How long have you guys been paying taxes without knowing how tax brackets work?
    Let's have a look at the data involved in MG's statement:

    1945 tax rates:
    93% $150,000 to $200,000
    94% $200,000 to infinity

    BUT at the bottom is a note:

    Note: Tax rates include normal tax of 3 percent plus applicable surtax. The maximum effective tax rate on net income was 90 percent. Last law to change rates was the Internal Revenue
    Code of 1945.
    This tells me that in 1945 I would have been charged a maximum of 90% if I made $200,000.

    Furthermore, if I made anywhere between $150,000 and $200,000, I would have still been taxed at 90%. Without the maximum rate being specified, from $150,000 to $200,000, I would have been taxed at 93%. From $200,000 up, I would have been taxed at 94%. So say I made $199,999...tax rate would be 93%. $200,001 = 94%

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •