Alex Jones Piers Morgan Part 1. 1776 Will Commence Again' If Guns Taken Away

[PorkChopSandwiches]

It is a bit much with the yelling. But you can't make your point if you let Pierce open his tea hole

[Hugh_Janus]

If they take our guns, we'll kill the English

I haven't watched it yet but I will...

I'm safe then :phew:

[RBP]

I suppose... but it's hard to watch with all that.

[Muddy]

If they take our guns, we'll kill the English

[Muddy]

I actually lol'd on that one Rainbow

[Lambchop]

Yeah you like that idea huh

[Muddy]

Nah I just thought it was funny..

[Lambchop]

1/10 of ya'll has British blood in yer veins. And those are just the ones who have reported their heritage.

:tea&crumpetsfap:

[Muddy]

I'm pretty sure I'm heavy uk islands...

[RBP]

you got the heavy part right.

[Muddy]

[RBP]

[FBD]

because it's his show

If you go on his show - expect to be interviewed by Morgan - in his style and his agenda.

The guest acted like a blowhard, who didn't want to answer the host's questions. If you are not willing to be interviewed then don't go on the show.

And Yes - to me he came across as unstable and prone to a short temper - someone that I would not want to have a gun.

I am discussing this video and stating that Jones did not do any favours for his position on guns. I don't like P. Morgan as a host, but after viewing that video I was more on his side than Jones

style and agenda aside, if the host is not willing to let an opposing viewpoint even be presented in the context of an answer to a question the host asked, he's got some problems. especially when making preposterous assertions - he should expect to be challenged when he makes a preposterous claim! if giving an answer is cut off so that another question can be presented because ol piers didnt like that he wasnt receiving an answer he wanted to hear, so ok next question...I mean, really?

[Muddy]

Was Larry King ever this divisive?

[MrsM]

style and agenda aside, if the host is not willing to let an opposing viewpoint even be presented in the context of an answer to a question the host asked, he's got some problems. especially when making preposterous assertions - he should expect to be challenged when he makes a preposterous claim! if giving an answer is cut off so that another question can be presented because ol piers didnt like that he wasnt receiving an answer he wanted to hear, so ok next question...I mean, really?

What interview did you watch? I saw a unstable blowhard avoid the pompous hosts questions again and again - he avoided the hosts questions and refused to accept stats that contridicted his stance. He easily talked for 75% of the interview and did nothing to get his point across.