Batman Vs Superman Dawn of Justice
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
It doesn't look half bad. I didn't have high expectations for it initially, but judging from this teaser trailer, it looks like they may have put together a decent film here.
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
i'm sure i'll see it, still hoping they turn around superman at some point in time, maybe it takes batman to do that
Comic-con trailer
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
Yt Trash (07-12-2015)
Marvel > DC
The majority of the time, I agree. But when they're done right, Superman and Batman are, individually, the best and most iconic super heroes ever. They probably won't be here, but I don't care, I'm gonna go see the flick anyway.
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
There has yet to be a good Batman movie made and the only good Superman flick was made in 1978
That's your opinion.
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
Name a better Superman film than the original Superman from 1978
That's one part of a two part logical statement connected be a logical and. In a statement connected by a logical and, both parts must be true for the entire statement to be true. Just because the 1978 Superman film was the best so far, that doesn't make your statement logically valid. Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy was fantastic and just because you didn't like the trilogy doesn't mean it wasn't. So your statement is logically false based on the false assertion that "there has yet to be a good Batman movie made".
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
And Superman Returns wasn't a bad movie. It just lacked some oomph. Kevin Spacey was a good Lex Luthor. I still want to see a sequel to that film.
Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.
You're right, I did forget there has been ONE good Batman flick:Originally Posted by DemonGeminiX
That's one part of a two part logical statement connected be a logical and. In a statement connected by a logical and, both parts must be true for the entire statement to be true. Just because the 1978 Superman film was the best so far, that doesn't make your statement logically valid. Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy was fantastic and just because you didn't like the trilogy doesn't mean it wasn't. So your statement is logically false based on the false assertion that "there has yet to be a good Batman movie made".
Gene Hackman > Kevin SpaceyAnd Superman Returns wasn't a bad movie. It just lacked some oomph. Kevin Spacey was a good Lex Luthor. I still want to see a sequel to that film.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
