PorkChopSandwiches (11-17-2015)
not too soon
So what was the story on the crash? They were driving withing city limits, totally speeding and the driver piled into a phone pole? Is it that simple?
I saw some footage where Walker was getting into the car and that was it
If I remember right they hit a tree or pole at around 110 mph on a dry evening / night
Pretty much, they were driving recklessly. I forget the speeds they were going but they lost control, hit the pole and while pinned the car caught fire.Originally Posted by Hal-9000
thanks..so then logically the daughter should be suing the dead guy rather than Porsche beca..
I had to stop typing
Noilly Pratt (11-17-2015)
Judge: Porsche not at fault in crash that killed Paul Walker
The Associated Press
A judge says the widow of a man driving the Porsche that crashed and killed actor Paul Walker cannot prove the carmaker is responsible for the accident.
U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez ruled Monday that there wasn't enough evidence in Kristine Rodas' claims that her husband died because the Porsche Carrera GT he was driving lacked several key safety features.
Gutierrez also ruled there wasn't evidence the Porsche's suspension failed, as the lawsuit claimed.
Rodas is the widow of Roger Rodas, a friend of Walker's who was driving the Carrera GT when it crashed and burst into flames in Santa Clarita in November 2013.
Her attorney, Mark Geragos, says the ruling will be appealed.
Celebrity website TMZ first reported the ruling Tuesday.
redred (04-06-2016)
They gonna sue the three trees now?
Don't give them any ideas
Maybe they can sue the city because the pavement wasn't grippy enough to keep the car on the road?
what can the lawyers convince her to sue for next:
maybe the pole was too hard
Hitler didn't think so
Too soon?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
