Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Trump DOJ sues California over 'interference' with immigration enforcement

  1. #1
    #DeSantis2024 Teh One Who Knocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    5280' Above Sea Level
    Posts
    256,055
    vCash
    10966
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Thanks
    23,819
    Thanked 113,101 Times in 59,908 Posts

    Law Trump DOJ sues California over 'interference' with immigration enforcement

    By Bill Mears | Fox News




    The Trump Justice Department filed a lawsuit Tuesday night against California, saying three recently-passed state laws were deliberately interfering with federal immigration policies.

    It marked the latest legal and political confrontation with the nation's most populous state, which the federal government says has repeatedly stood in the way of its plans to step up enforcement actions in the workplace and against criminal aliens.

    "The Department of Justice and the Trump Administration are going to fight these unjust, unfair, and unconstitutional policies," Attorney General Jeff Sessions was expected to tell California law enforcement officers on Wednesday. "We are fighting to make your jobs safer and to help you reduce crime in America."

    The state's Democratic governor, Jerry Brown, fired back: “At a time of unprecedented political turmoil, Jeff Sessions has come to California to further divide and polarize America. Jeff, these political stunts may be the norm in Washington, but they don’t work here. SAD!!!”

    Federal officials are seeking an injunction to immediately block enforcement of the three California laws, each enacted within the past year.

    One of those laws offers additional worker protections against federal immigration enforcement actions. Senior Justice Department officials have said it's prevented companies from voluntarily cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

    Employers are mandated under the law to demand ICE agents present a warrant or subpoena before entering certain areas of the premises, or when accessing some employee records.

    Some companies have complained they've felt torn between trying to comply with seemingly contradictory state and federal statutes, since penalties for non-compliance can be steep from both entities.

    Another state law dubbed known by critics as the "sanctuary state" bill protects immigrants without legal residency by limiting state and municipal cooperation with the feds, including what information can be shared about illegal-immigrant inmates.

    A third law gives state officials the power to monitor and inspect immigrant detention facilities either run directly by, or contracted through, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    The Justice Department has said it's confident the Constitution's Supremacy Clause gives it broad authority to supersede state laws that it says interfere with its immigration enforcement obligations.

    Still, state officials in the past have cited the 10th Amendment’s guarantee of states not being compelled to enforce federal laws.

    “We’ve seen this B-rated movie before. So we’re not totally surprised,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in response to the new lawsuit.

    The Justice Department is also reviewing Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf's decision to warn of an immigration sweep in advance, which ICE said allowed hundreds of immigrants to escape detention. “Oakland is a city of immigrants. We will continue to exercise our legal right to exist as a sanctuary city. We will continue to inform all residents about their Constitutional rights, and we will continue to support California’s sanctuary status,” the Democratic mayor responded.

    An estimated 2.5 million immigrants are believed to be in California illegally. In the most recent figures, ICE has reported about 16 percent of its enforcement apprehensions take place in that state.

    The latest legal action by the Trump administration is part of an aggressive push to enforce existing immigration laws, with Sessions in previous remarks citing a porous U.S. border with Mexico, and the threat of criminal activity by immigrant gangs.

    Federal officials repeatedly have cited the case of Kate Steinle, shot to death by an illegal alien and seven-time felon in San Francisco, one of 35 communities in the state declaring itself a "sanctuary city."

    The Justice Department in January threatened California and other states with subpoenas and a loss of grant money for repeatedly failing to respond to requests for immigration compliance under a federal law known as Section 1373.

    Federal officials would not say whether other states were at risk of similar lawsuits over their alleged non-compliance with immigration laws.

    A coordinated ICE enforcement action last month on businesses in the Los Angeles area netted 212 people arrested for violating federal immigration laws, 88 percent of whom were convicted criminals, officials said.

    Fox News' Melissa Chrise, Jake Gibson, Lee Ross and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

  2. #2
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts






  3. #3
    Mr Magoo RBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    60,390
    vCash
    2000
    Mentioned
    185 Post(s)
    Thanks
    78,181
    Thanked 27,731 Times in 15,014 Posts
    Porky, seriously, what's the rationale in CA for being dicks about illegals? They just don't believe in American sovereignty?
    I wanted to be a Monk, but I never got the chants.

  4. #4
    Take Box B DemonGeminiX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Bum Fuck Egypt, East Jabip
    Posts
    64,807
    vCash
    27021
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Thanks
    45,043
    Thanked 16,893 Times in 11,968 Posts
    Democrats need the votes. They keep pissing off their citizens with their policies and taxes, so in an effort to maintain power, they gift the illegals so that they'll vote Democrat.


    Warning: The posts of this forum member may contain trigger language which may be considered offensive to some.

    Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DemonGeminiX For This Useful Post:

    KevinD (03-08-2018), PorkChopSandwiches (03-07-2018)

  6. #5
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts
    ^^ This






  7. #6
    transracial Hal-9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    On the Discovery
    Posts
    92,176
    vCash
    1000
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Thanks
    5,803
    Thanked 11,849 Times in 8,184 Posts
    So the President can sue elements of the government..

    this is one of those federal vs state things?

    Not arguing the intent itself, just trying to understand the 'Merican justice system

  8. #7
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts
    The federal government has the ultimate say, what CA is doing is making it illegal for local law enforcement to enforce federal policy...which is illegal






  9. #8
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts
    Except for when its about weed, than it fine






  10. The Following User Says Thank You to PorkChopSandwiches For This Useful Post:

    Hal-9000 (03-07-2018)

  11. #9
    transracial Hal-9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    On the Discovery
    Posts
    92,176
    vCash
    1000
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Thanks
    5,803
    Thanked 11,849 Times in 8,184 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PorkChopSandwiches View Post
    The federal government has the ultimate say, what CA is doing is making it illegal for local law enforcement to enforce federal policy...which is illegal
    So it's simply - Federal law says we must do this...and then the state law is passed and goes against federal intent?

    ffs...y'all live in one country One bill or law should trump everything else..




    you saw that, right?

  12. #10
    #DeSantis2024 Teh One Who Knocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    5280' Above Sea Level
    Posts
    256,055
    vCash
    10966
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Thanks
    23,819
    Thanked 113,101 Times in 59,908 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hal-9000 View Post
    So it's simply - Federal law says we must do this...and then the state law is passed and goes against federal intent?

    ffs...y'all live in one country One bill or law should trump everything else..




    you saw that, right?
    States are allowed to make laws that are tougher than federal law (within the framework of the Constitution) but they can't make laws that are more lenient or contradict federal law.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Teh One Who Knocks For This Useful Post:

    Hal-9000 (03-07-2018)

  14. #11
    Hal killed Tormund! Pony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Borneo
    Posts
    17,296
    vCash
    2000
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Thanks
    7,298
    Thanked 7,742 Times in 4,207 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hal-9000 View Post

    ffs...y'all live in one country One bill or law should trump everything else..
    In a weird way, it works. Since different areas of the country have different issues it's typically better for the Fed to stay out of it and let the individual states/counties/cities, etc decide on their own what's best for their specific area.

    The Fed should only be involved for general guidelines, not to regulate every aspect of everyone's lives everywhere.

  15. #12
    Shelter Dweller PorkChopSandwiches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77,135
    vCash
    5000
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    47,197
    Thanked 29,255 Times in 16,489 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pony View Post
    In a weird way, it works. Since different areas of the country have different issues it's typically better for the Fed to stay out of it and let the individual states/counties/cities, etc decide on their own what's best for their specific area.

    The Fed should only be involved for general guidelines, not to regulate every aspect of everyone's lives everywhere.
    They should deal with borders and foreign countries IMO...that being said illegals infiltrating the country should be dealt with by the Fed as well, and the states should turn them over






  16. The Following User Says Thank You to PorkChopSandwiches For This Useful Post:

    Pony (03-08-2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •