Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Prince Harry calls First Amendment ‘bonkers,’ faces backlash from Cruz, Crenshaw, others

  1. #1
    Lying dog-faced pony soldier Teh One Who Knocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    5280' Above Sea Level
    Posts
    238,386
    vCash
    8261
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Thanks
    20,063
    Thanked 95,866 Times in 51,660 Posts

    Wanker Prince Harry calls First Amendment ‘bonkers,’ faces backlash from Cruz, Crenshaw, others

    By David Aaro | Fox News




    Prince Harry is facing a wave of backlash after calling the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution "bonkers" during a podcast appearance last week.

    The Duke of Sussex made the comments on an episode of Dax Shepard and Monica Padman’s "Armchair Expert" podcast.

    While chatting about life in Los Angeles – where Harry and wife Meghan Markle have settled since leaving the United Kingdom – the prince discussed what he called the media "freezing frenzy" resulting from his stay at film producer and actor Tyler Perry’s Beverly Hills mansion. He specifically took issue with the paparazzi.

    "I don't want to start sort of going down the First Amendment route because that's a huge subject and one in which I don't understand because I've only been here a short period of time," Harry said. "But, you can find a loophole in anything. And you can capitalize or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said."

    "I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers," he continued.

    Harry's comments ignited a wave of criticism online.

    "Nice that he can say that," replied Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

    "Well I just doubled the size of my Independence Day party." wrote Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas on Twitter.

    Former Brexit leader Nigel Farage tweeted: "For Prince Harry to condemn the USA's First Amendment shows he has lost the plot. Soon he will not be wanted on either side of the pond."

    "He’s such a tiresome flog. Shut up, Harry," wrote Rita Panahi, an Australian newspaper columnist.

    "Sunday Riddle: How many more Hollywood-style interviews will Prince Harry and Meghan Markle give before they finally achieve the privacy they claim to be so desperate for?" replied Candace Owens, a conservative political activist.

    "I wonder if he also thinks the Fourth Amendment is ‘bollocks’ and the 14th Amendment is ‘pish-posh,’" added conservative author, filmmaker, and podcast host, Dinesh D'Souza.

    "Imagine being completely mystified by the idea that people have a right to speak their minds without fear of being arrested," another user tweeted.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Teh One Who Knocks For This Useful Post:

    FBD (05-17-2021)

  3. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    the failed nation-state once known as the USA
    Posts
    23,270
    vCash
    1000
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Thanks
    15,372
    Thanked 5,408 Times in 3,648 Posts
    there's reasons monarchs have been killed by their populations in history

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •